DYN 1 - 3 MD | Rink Rivals

FINALS9Mar 26 · 9:00 PM

Dynamo

DYN

DYN

THREE STARS

1ST

BAR D0WN 43

LW2 G · 0 A · 2 PTS

2ND

ZienoYT

G11 SV · .917

3RD

Jellyl35l

C1 G · 0 A · 1 PTS

GOALS

TEAM STATS

DYN

Final

Shots

Shot attempts

Hits

8:00

Time on attack

10:55

Faceoff wins

DYN

Final

Takeaways

Giveaways

Blocked shots

Pass attempts

Penalty minutes

RECAP

The Mighty Deks controlled the tempo in a disciplined 3-1 victory over Dynamo, relying on superior possession and a stifling defensive structure to neutralize their opponents. The game was a tight, low-event affair through the first two periods, but the Deks eventually broke the deadlock by capitalizing on cross-crease opportunities and sustained offensive zone pressure. While Dynamo managed to hang around thanks to some physical play, the turning point came in the third period when the Mighty Deks' cycle game wore down the Dynamo blue line, allowing them to stretch a one-goal lead into a comfortable two-goal cushion that they never relinquished. The offensive spark for the Mighty Deks came primarily from zero_fcks_giivn, who netted 2 goals on 5 shots, including the game-winner. His ability to find soft spots in the Dynamo coverage was the difference-maker. Defensively, the Deks were bolstered by a massive physical performance from peckl87l, who recorded 10 hits while centering the top line. Between the pipes, .zieno. provided a steady presence, stopping 11 of 12 shots for a .917 save percentage. Dynamo’s resistance was led by lleclerc27, who tried to shift the momentum with a game-high 13 hits, and jellyqctabarnak69696, who accounted for their lone goal. Ultimately, the statistical divide in Time on Attack (TOA) told the story of this matchup. The Mighty Deks dominated the puck, racking up 10:55 (655 seconds) in the offensive zone compared to Dynamo's 8:00 (480 seconds). This nearly 3-minute advantage allowed the Deks to dictate the pace and limit Dynamo to just 12 shots all game. With neither side managing to score on the power play or short-handed, the Deks' ability to execute at even strength and maintain high-quality possession proved to be the deciding factor in the win.

Dynamo


CJellyl35l	1	0	1	-2	3	0	4	7	1	4	1	7	9	9	50%	1	3	14	7	50%	4:04	60
LWRyGuyX9	0	1	1	-2	3	1	3	7	2	0	0	7	0	0	–	0	3	20	14	70%	2:55	60
RWLleclerc27	0	1	1	-2	2	13	0	17	0	1	0	17	0	0	–	0	2	19	11	58%	6:14	60
DWhoUsedAlltheTP	0	0	0	-2	2	2	3	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	–	0	3	14	13	93%	2:25	60
DYouGotMaiil	0	0	0	-2	0	1	6	3	0	0	0	3	0	0	–	0	3	19	18	95%	3:16	60

Goalies	SV%	GAA	SV	SA	GA
GRedSkinStallion	.800	3.00	12	15	3

Mighty Deks


LWBAR D0WN 43	2	0	2	+2	5	3	0	1	3	8	1	0	0	8	0	0	–	6	14	12	86%	4:06	60
RWChandler4911	1	0	1	+2	3	1	0	0	3	8	0	1	0	8	0	1	0%	4	21	14	67%	7:26	60
DTwO AcCuRaTE	0	1	1	+2	0	0	0	0	2	4	2	0	0	4	0	0	–	3	19	17	89%	3:06	60
DEricHMusic	0	1	1	+2	1	1	0	0	3	3	1	1	0	3	0	0	–	5	18	17	94%	2:52	60
CPeck l87 l	0	0	0	+2	5	10	2	0	4	11	2	1	1	11	9	8	53%	5	20	13	65%	3:30	59