BRD 2 - 6 FLM | Rink Rivals

FINALS10Jul 8 · 9:00 PM

The Brand

BRD

FLM

BRD

FLM

THREE STARS

1ST

l Volcom x 28 l

RW4 G · 1 A · 5 PTS

2ND

Chandler4911

C1 G · 2 A · 3 PTS

3RD

Saucyfozy

LW1 G · 2 A · 3 PTS

GOALS

TEAM STATS

BRD

Final

FLM

Shots

Shot attempts

Hits

8:29

Time on attack

9:07

Faceoff wins

BRD

Final

FLM

Takeaways

Giveaways

Blocked shots

Pass attempts

128

Penalty minutes

RECAP

The Flamingos put on a clinical display of offensive efficiency to secure a 6-2 victory over The Brand. While the time on attack was surprisingly close (9:07 for the Flamingos vs 8:29 for The Brand), the narrative of the game was defined by what each team did with their possession. The Flamingos dictated the tempo early and never looked back, capitalizing on a relentless forecheck and superior shot selection. The Brand struggled to find any sustained rhythm, often seeing their zone entries neutralized before they could test the goaltender. The story of the night was the dominant performance of l Volcom x 28 l, who accounted for nearly the entire Flamingos offense with 4 goals and 1 assist. His 10 shots on net kept The Brand's defense on their heels throughout the game. Supporting him was Chandler4911, who turned in a massive performance at center with 1 goal and 2 assists while completely controlling the faceoff circle. On the blue line, thatbaillieguy was a model of efficiency, completing 32 of 35 passes and recording 6 takeaways to jumpstart the transition game. For The Brand, Gucci Goals and SKontos39 managed to find the back of the net, but they lacked the secondary scoring needed to keep pace. The statistical divide in this contest came down to two major factors: faceoff dominance and puck security. The Flamingos won the draw 20 times compared to just 6 for The Brand, allowing them to start almost every sequence with puck control. Furthermore, while the Flamingos moved the puck with 128 pass attempts, The Brand's offense was frequently derailed by turnovers. Rapierrrr's 12 hits provided some physical pushback for The Brand, but his 23 giveaways proved too costly to overcome. The Flamingos’ ability to generate 22 shots while limiting The Brand to just 13 made the 4-goal margin a fair reflection of the play.

The Brand


LWRapierrrr	0	2	2	-4	3	12	0	0	23	2	0	0	23	0	0	–	0	0	0	3	17	9	53%	6:42	60
RWGucci Goals	1	0	1	-4	1	3	2	5	4	4	0	0	4	0	0	–	0	0	0	2	21	19	90%	3:31	58
CSKontos39	1	0	1	-4	4	2	0	4	3	3	1	1	3	6	20	23%	0	1	0	5	20	16	80%	3:10	60
DWhoUsedAlltheTP	0	1	1	-4	2	6	0	1	0	3	2	0	0	0	0	–	0	0	1	2	10	10	100%	1:47	60
Dlividpenguin663	0	0	0	-4	2	9	0	1	5	0	0	0	5	0	0	–	1	0	0	3	19	14	74%	2:38	60

Goalies	SV%	GAA	SV	SA	GA	BRK SV	BRK SA
GRedSkinStallion	.727	6.00	16	22	6	0	0

Flamingos


RWl Volcom x 28 l	4	1	5	+4	10	6	0	1	2	8	0	0	0	8	0	0	–	0	13	21	14	67%	4:09	60
LWSaucyfozy	1	2	3	+4	3	1	2	0	2	9	0	0	0	9	0	0	–	0	3	26	14	54%	5:14	58
CChandler4911	1	2	3	+4	3	1	0	0	2	9	3	2	3	9	20	6	77%	1	2	30	23	77%	4:45	60
DGyneman	0	2	2	+4	1	0	0	0	3	1	3	0	0	1	0	0	–	0	3	16	11	69%	2:07	60
DThatbaillieguy	0	1	1	+4	1	6	0	0	6	2	1	1	0	2	0	0	–	0	4	35	32	91%	5:19	60