LB 2 - 5 MD | Rink Rivals

FINALS9Mar 19 · 9:00 PM

Los Bandidos

THREE STARS

1ST

Animal x86

LW1 G · 3 A · 4 PTS

2ND

T R 3 Y N 4

C2 G · 1 A · 3 PTS

3RD

Chandler4911

G16 SV · .889

GOALS

TEAM STATS

Final

Shots

Shot attempts

Hits

8:16

Time on attack

9:07

Faceoff wins

Power-play goals

Final

Takeaways

Giveaways

Blocked shots

Pass attempts

108

Penalty minutes

RECAP

The Mighty Deks defended their home ice with a clinical 5-2 victory over Los Bandidos, relying on superior puck control and efficient finishing to bridge the gap. While Los Bandidos actually outshot the hosts 18-15, the game swung in favor of the Mighty Deks during the second period as their sustained pressure began to wear down the opposition’s structure. The turning point came through a disciplined defensive effort that forced Los Bandidos into low-percentage looks, allowing the Mighty Deks to transition quickly and capitalize on their 547 seconds of time on attack. The visiting side saw some individual brilliance despite the loss, particularly from sh0wxoutx86, who had a hand in every goal for his squad with a 4-point night (1 goal, 3 assists). tr3yn4 also provided a spark with 2 goals, including a power-play marker, while bard15 and xdemon12x tried to set a physical tone with 9 hits apiece. However, the Mighty Deks' balanced scoring approach eventually overwhelmed exhumingsouls, who struggled in net with a .667 save percentage. On the other end, chandler4911 was steady for the Deks, turning aside 16 of 18 shots to keep his team in the driver's seat throughout the final frame. The deciding factor in this contest was pure efficiency and possession management. The Mighty Deks made their opportunities count, scoring on 33% of their total shots compared to just 11% for Los Bandidos. This clinical edge, combined with a nearly minute-long advantage in time on attack, prevented the visitors from ever establishing a sustained comeback rhythm. While Los Bandidos brought plenty of physicality, their inability to convert high-volume shooting into high-quality scoring chances proved to be their downfall against a more composed Mighty Deks lineup.

Los Bandidos


RWxDemon12x	1	1	2	-2	3	9	0	7	4	2	0	4	0	1	0%	0	4	23	17	74%	3:11	60
LWxxILL ADVISEDxx	1	1	2	-2	5	2	0	3	6	2	0	6	0	0	–	0	5	19	14	74%	3:03	60
DYumbelievable	0	1	1	-2	1	1	0	1	0	5	1	0	0	0	–	0	1	17	12	71%	1:49	60
CI BARD 15 I	0	0	0	-2	6	9	2	3	7	3	0	7	7	9	44%	1	9	16	13	81%	6:09	59
DFowIerrr	0	0	0	-2	0	0	0	4	4	0	1	4	0	0	–	0	1	15	10	67%	3:11	60

Goalies	SV%	GAA	SV	SA	GA
GEXHUMING SOULS	.667	5.00	10	15	5

Mighty Deks


LWAnimal x86	1	3	4	+2	5	2	0	0	1	8	3	0	8	0	0	–	1	0	5	25	20	80%	5:21	60
CT R 3 Y N 4	2	1	3	+2	3	3	2	1	1	8	1	1	8	10	6	63%	0	0	3	17	13	76%	3:30	58
DKosh 14	0	3	3	+2	0	1	0	0	3	11	1	1	11	0	0	–	0	0	0	31	21	68%	6:12	60
RWitspescar	1	1	2	+2	4	3	0	0	1	11	0	0	11	0	1	0%	0	0	5	18	11	61%	4:51	60
DTherealestbean	1	0	1	+2	1	0	0	0	3	8	1	0	8	0	0	–	0	1	1	17	8	47%	3:32	60